A collaborative research project involving 12 leading structural engineering firms to study the life cycle assessment of 16 different structural scenarios for a 248-metre tall tower, and for a 490-metre-tall tower. One of the objectives is to create a definitive comparison of the life-cycle implications of steel, concrete and composite structural systems in tall buildings. Additionally, a methodology for the assessment of life cycle energy and carbon use in tall building structural systems will be developed.
Could this methodology be used as a standard?
4 ways LEED v4 will change business
“Figuring out how to best implement more holistic sustainability reporting is a work in progress, but we see life cycle assessment, chemical hazard assessment and supply chain transparency as part of the new normal for manufacturers in every sector.
The final question for companies everywhere remains: Will you contribute proactively to making new tools such as LEED v4 work for business, or will you simply react as these trends move into your sector?” –By Mikhail Davis and Melissa Vernon
1. Harnessing the power of transparency
2. Using LCA as a product differentiator
3. Responsible sourcing of (all) raw materials
4. Hazard-based ingredients reporting
Posted in Standards
- Tagged Buildings, Corporate Reporting, Corporate Strategy, hazardous materials, LCA, LEED v4, Life-cycle assessment, Materials, sourcing of raw materials, Standards & Certification, Supply chain, U.S Green Building Council